Taking a picture of a beautiful field is just a picture - the art is the field. So does photography. A piece of art is something that somehow sums up history and thought somehow, a painting for example needs so much thought and will ALWAYS have some sort of message and meaning behind it, its almost like a poem and the fact that art is so unique might be due to the fact that unlike photography, art usually requires time, and not just a click. ‘Oh no it isn’t,’ said an art critic. Photography is a diverse profession/hobby, and as such there will always be debates around some of its more controversial topics. First, settle down and let me tell you a story about bees. The writing of the poem? From presidential selfies to never-ending Instagram feeds, the world is now drowning in images. Photography. In graphite & paper or acrylic on canvas, there is rarely a need to 'be perfect' (with the possible exception of technical drawing or architectural plans, and it's more about 'accuracy' than 'perfection'); there is no internal requirement that defines a picture other than what the hand creates with its stylus or brush. You can draw a picture with a cheap pencil and sheet paper and if you know what you're doing still be able to crank out something impressive; it's something entirely different to claim your skill in positioning and lighting and owning a good camera (DSLR or otherwise) that set you back several thousand dollars, let alone whatever costs are involved in getting where you need to be to attempt a given individual picture. Perhaps if someone has worked on setting up a scene, putting together props and characters, and arranging them in a unique way that maybe conveys a message and takes a picture, maybe.I can really appreciate photographers that travel to all corners of the world and take unique pictures of a culture that is completely alien to me. The person controls the camera, the person clicks the button, they control what they take a picture of. The photographer is creating the photograph. The ultimate debate in history: is photography art? Yes, you can augment it with photoshop and other software. It's artificial construction of something else. Photography is most definitely art! It's an age-old question, one of the first any student of photography attending an art school will tackle, can photography be considered art? Photography is as vibrant as it has ever been - more so in response to the digital world, which Jonathan mistakenly thinks has made everyone a great photographer. I want to debate why photography is considered an art – or not as the case may be. Art is beauty, and photography is fully capable of being beautiful. Sean O’Hagan, writes a counter argument for photograph as an art form, within the same publication which does a good job of rebuking Mr. Jones’ article by citing multiple photographers whose work sell successfully through various galleries. There was a quarrel about this recently in The Guardian. I’ll explain this in a minute. Arguably every image, whether a drawing painting or photograph is "art". Thus, it follows that ‘I want a fast car so I can drive very very far’ can be poetry. Vehemently defending photography was Ansel Adams and here’s what he said about the topic: “Photography is more than a medium for factual communication of ideas. There are many, many photos out there that are NOT art. I pop into the National Gallery to view the 2014 BP National Portrait Award and look in bemusement at the exhibition, which is mostly comprised of rather old-fashioned paintings. Art is valued more than gold. Art is beauty, and photography is fully capable of being beautiful. Has he never stood in wonder in front of a Julia Margaret Cameron portrait? Edit it, leave the grass and sky black and white, and make the apple a deep red, and the leaves golden and brown. But it’s now a more important one, says Simon Bowcock. The reason i say it is art is due to the soul fact that art is a way for one to espress themself and photography is a way to espress yourself so in the way. Pictures can look amazing and beautiful at times, but you're taking a picture of something that is already there. Celebrated photographers debate the impact of this mass democratisation on their craft Many bees and wasps also have a characteristic yellow-and-black striped coloring. What public view … Yes, and you degrade the medium lower than already is (i’ll explain this later). First, many people believed that photography could not be art, because it was made by a machine rather than by human creativity. Firstly, you have to look at the history of photography, where it all began: the first documented photograph is View From the Window at Le Gras taken by Nicéphore Niépce in 1826/27; though this may not technically be the first, it is the olde… Insect predators categorically learn that when they see yellow and black stripes, it’s time to stay away. Mangelsen, a wildlife photographer, was keying in on a long debate in that world: whether photography is fine art and, if it is, what type of photography is deemed as such. Photography is often perceived as an objective, and therefore unbiased, medium for documenting and preserving historic moments and national and world histories, and for visualizing and narrating news stories. Naturally there is no right answer just our own opinion and your vie Photographers capture art, they are not artists. Some will say “photography isn't art” and others will defend this until they're blue in the face! A great photographer can make a great photograph whatever the camera. Photographic societies—made up of both professionals and amateurs enticed by the popularity of the collodion process—began to form in the mid-19th century, giving rise to the consideration of photography as an aesthetic medium. If I were a painter, I could wake up in the morning and paint my vision or any vision I have. Art is passion. Photographers capture art, they are not artists. Some do, but most do not. Let me just get my phone out and take black and white pictures of the flowers and vase in my lounge. No, and you start an equally difficult argument as to what must ‘go in to’ a photograph to become art. For Jonathan, though, “This record-setting picture typifies everything that goes wrong when photographers think they are artists”. Anything is art. Truth of Fiction? He makes no distinction between types of photography, and seems unaware, that photography has changed utterly since Henri Cartier-Bresson. We will discern formation of photography and aspects of photography, on which we can consider it as an art in essay about photography. Well photography is nothing more than a person standing there and taking a picture. Let’s be clear—I’m aware of how unpopular my position is, especially among my design peers. Photography is not art, because photos can be copied. A photograph can look artistic because you have the compositional skills but the talent is in the painter who can create from nothing. As for the argument that a camera is not a living thing and it is creating the photograph, that is not true. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Open your minds, For those who say that art is made only by a person not a device, you're wrong. It’s an uninspiring show, a hotchpotch, as are most exhibitions drawn from open submissions. It is still his story which he had thought up. Comparison’s have been made to authors using type writers vs the pen. Indeed a difficult question. Would you class my example above as art. The difference between a painting of someone and a picture of them is profound. Photography critic Sean O’Hagan hits back at Jonathan Jones’s damning claim that photographs cannot be considered fine art, • Jonathan Jones: why photography is not art, Last modified on Thu 26 Mar 2020 14.44 GMT. The camera records the image, but the photographer is the one capturing the emotion or beauty of the moment. Photography is a form of art and if you say else then you are wrong ... they haven't yet mastered the art of photography. © Eggleston Artistic Trust. Is Photography science or is it art? D. photographers today are more creative than those of the past. Unlikely to happen.That is a difficult question to answer and everybody will have their own definition. As someone who is fond of photography, I definitely believe it to be art! If it contains emotion, it's art. With ‘art’ such as painting, sculpture, dancing music etc, the artist has physically created the piece. Are we taking pictures or creating them? Actually it is both but early photography communities were struggling as they were trying to have an overall identity for photography. Everybody who can hold a pencil or brush can create an image. They were already there. Art is beautiful. Jonathan writes that photographs look better on a computer screen than in a print. But an painter (artist) could never hand a brush to anyone and have them recreate the scene. Anyone can just hold a camera and snap a picture, but you won't get a truly great photograph that way. Photography is an art, it is expression of emotional power of human nature which reveals hidden stories, shows the truth.. Art can only be made by living beings, not by non-breathing devices. I say this not to trivialise the debate, but to provide a narrative as to what photography has become. Wait, I need proof. Let me take painting as an example to focus the debate. It doesn't matter if you made something out of nothing, or something out of something. Why damn photography because of the excesses of the auction houses and mega-rich collectors? I pop into the National Gallery to view the 2014 BP National Portrait Award and look in bemusement at the exhibition, which is mostly comprised of rather old-fashioned paintings. A simple photograph of a chair in a dark corner might not mean anything to you, but to someone else, they can relate to it. So do photography. Do Jane Bown, William Eggleston and Diane Arbus not sing on a gallery wall? Several things are wrong about Jonathan’s reasoning, not least that he still thinks painting is in some sort of competition with photography. If you made something out of nothing, congradulations you made art. Taking a picture of a beautiful field is just a picture - the art is the field. Three main positions emerged. Look at the politically charged conceptualism of Broomberg and Chanarin, the playful invention of a fictional series by Joan Fontcuberta, the wonderful artists books made by the likes of Cristina de Middel or Viviane Sassen. Yes there are cameras out there that you can just point and shoot but is really going to look right? Of course, I could photoshop it and change it. The camera has come to substitute paintings.. When I paint, it is MY hand which is capturing the photo. This will run and run……. The debate on photography as art is not a new debate. One which philosophers have pondered over for ages. The creativity that has gone into it is not diminished by typing it. Photography is a less pure art form than painting and sculpture. Art through photography is not easy at all. Photos on a wall are considered art and I think that it is just totally wrong to say that photography is not art! Art has "fans". Art requires technology and skills. It also happens to be the most accessible and democratic way of making art that has ever been invented. Photography is art. And there are national and international associations /organizations of Art photography. What's that I saw on your linked in profile under interests? Not only that, but I then extrapolate that all painting is dull and stupid – Caravaggio, Rubens, Picasso, Hockney, Richter, the lot. Art requires patience. The important thing is that there is no right or wrong answer, just differences of opinion and ways of working. What we’re interested in when it comes to photography isn’t the output of the medium itself. The central question is how to determine whether craft is art. Photography has all characters of Art. So is photography. B. photographers and artists have the same principal aims. To which my response is: so what? I rest my argument with how many times do you see a photograph of something and say oh my god that is so pretty or I wish I was there enjoying that beauty. If you made something out of something, congratulations, you added on to the art and created more art to it. Or a Jack Vettriano? magine, if you will, the following scene. Art serves itself and serves people. How many paintings are of something that does not exist? After I processed a couple of photographs and showed him… he came up with a comment, along the lines… Art is talent first, skill second (nobody teaches you how to draw. Art is expression, and photography is fully capable of being a medium of expression. Although photography quickly became popular after its invention, it was mainly considered to be a craft and not an art form at all. If it contains emotion, it's art. The answer is obvious: photography is an art. It is my hand which is creating the indelible mark and capturing emotion, light perspective, etc. With the camera its a lens, computer or printer. Here are a few artists who use photography: Cindy Sherman, Jeff Wall, Gillian Wearing. And to those who say it takes no skill to take a photograph YOUR WRONG you have to know what type of lighting you have to have and at what angle you have to be at in order to take a good picture. So does photography. Lastly, there's the 'needs to be perfect' syndrome in photography. It hasn’t. Artist's can't paint their original painting twice, but photos can be reproduced thousands of times. He castigated both, as I, a photography critic, would probably have done had I the energy to kick a few dead horses. A bad one will still make a bad photograph on a two grand digital camera that does everything for you. that a given visual artist will intentionally or unintentionally involve in the progression and completion of a drawing. When everything is setup a 6 year old could walk up and press the button. In November, our art critic Jonathan Jones went to see the wildlife photographer of the year show at the National History Museum and the Taylor Wessing prize at the National Portrait Gallery – an open submission award known for its eccentric shortlist, usually featuring people with their pets. The Old Man and the Sea would still be an incredible exploration of a man’s moral fibre, the ethical exploration of fishing etc etc regardless of whether Hemingway had hand written it or typed. There is something to be said for choosing one's subject matter carefully as well as making sure to get a perfect shot. For nearly one hundred years it had no place in art shows or art galleries, and photographers were only seen as technicians, not artists. Artists, photographers and critics have been debating the question of photography as an art form for many years. It’s a question that comes up often in discussions about photography – usually raised by non-photographers. Imagine, if you will, the following scene. Even within the world of painting arguments rage as to what is considered art. This debate is heated and they’re a least two camps in this debate. Art is expression, and photography is fully capable of being a medium of expression. Many argue that Mark Rothko’s work can be dismissed as colours layered onto a large canvas, as though you were painting your living room wall. In art class at school I took a class on just photography and I learned so much from that! Though beauty is in the eye of the beholder and some people don't like that medium. I recently bought a children's coloring book and colored it. Commercial Art vs. Fine Art Commercial art, which is rarely showcased in a public setting outside of the context in which it was intended, is typically created specifically to sell something and it is used in everything from advertisements to packaging. Photography is not art, it is a picture of art. Yes, taking a picture at a nice angle or something may be creative, but it's more artistic if you can paint that shot instead of simply taking a picture. I have been studying and practicing it for three years now and I still haven't put out something I find worthy of being called 'art'. Culture > Art > Features What is art? I wish Jonathan had come with me to a group show I saw at Purdy Hicks this year called Natural Order. Is all we mean by art that it is something liked by the majority? Oh yes, the great debate of whether an image is a photograph or digital art erupted in our house last night.. Well it started by me reading a blog post by Glen Hannah about the Toolwiz Pic App and me downloading it and trying it on some of our photographs. These two topics might as well intertwine for many reasons. Its oration? It doesn't matter if you photograph it or paint it. I expect not. Fine art includes paintings, sculptures, printmaking, photography, installation, multi-media, sound art, and performance. Or maybe sometimes you will-- but that's part of the fun, human, subjective nature of art! Photography as art Early developments. There is no denying the fact that photography is art, regardless of one's definition. Photography has them too. I consider photography a knowledge, you are taught to use a machine to reproduce something already existing. It’s an uninspiring show, a hotchpotch, as are most exhibitions drawn from open submissions. Art is an opinion, photographers can be artist, art world is part BS, many photographers have read from the book of BS and studied intently 0 Kelly Myers - October 21, 2019 Artists and critics debated for many decades whether photography is art. Most photographers capture whatever is already there - very view design the content of their photos. Is a snapshot of my dog a piece of art? There is so many things you can do to photography. You can change the tints and colors. 28. Photography is skill first, talent second (one is taught about shutter speed or ISO...Etc then they take 17 pictures and hope one is good). From the beginning, artists were dismissive of photography, and saw it as a threat to “real art.’’ Even in the first presentations of 1839, classical painter Paul Delaroche is reported to have blurted out “From today, painting is dead!” Two decades later, the poet Charles Baudelaire wrote, i… The debate hinges on an ever-evolving understanding of the perception of what is considered art. So is photography. I would say mostly not. I’ve been to talks, read books, spoken with colleagues, and taken classes determined to establish the irreconcilable differences between art and design. I have seen some idiotic installation pieces over the years, but that doesn’t mean that all artists who make installations are idiots and their work dull and stupid. Granted this requires technical input, but the bottom line is that the physical creation was not done by you. As a painter (artist) I can doing anything. I expressed myself with the colors i used, would that be considered art? Photography is art, that is a fact. ‘Oh yes it is,’ said a photography writer. I don't dismiss photography as being a creative pursuit or something that does not require skill to do well (as is appropriate in any pursuit, at least to practice it and hone those skills) but I have trouble thinking of it as being 'art'. Warhol’s Polaroids and Ruscha’s deadpan photography books put it to bed years ago. Art, I believe is enhancing someone else's perspective on things. Is photography art? The definition of art is the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance. Their work sings on the gallery wall. If so then what is the form? In the ongoing debate about whether photographyshould be seen as a type of lens-based fine art, some critics consider that a photograph is produced by the application of a scientific technique rather than by genuinely creative camera work. Inexplicably enraged by this, I rush home and pen an article claiming that painting is dead and that, Biloxi, Mississippi, 1972. Art is in the creation. If taking a picture is not art because its from a machine, then music is not an art because of the machines they use to enhance the sound. Has he ever seen a painting or drawing of Samuel Beckett that possesses the stillness and intensity of the great photographic portrait of Samuel Beckett by John Minihan or Jane Bown? There were some good paintings and uncannily detailed drawings, but Awoiska van der Molen’s nightscapes made on long exposures in the volcanic islands of La Gomera and La Graciosa were breathtaking in their stillness and sense of mystery. Debates over the role of photography in art Edit. It's the same sort of arrogance that comes with rating yourself in terms of the technical specs of your computer (so common in certain PC gaming circles); there is certainly a series of skills both learned and improved upon, but there's a big difference between putting paint on a canvas and Xeroxing (digitally or with film) a chunk of reality you're looking at. A great photograph by William Eggleston, though he claims to be influenced by abstract painting, occupies its own space, makes its own rules. It has made it easy for people to take – and disseminate – photographs, that’s all. But, alas, he has repeated his claims this week, discussing a rather boring photograph by Peter Lik, which sold for £4.1m, becoming the most expensive photograph in the world. Ah I see, I think I'll add that one. A photo records only what is there, but an artist creates a painting by design by removing as well as adding things. That is the reason why photography isn’t art. No it doesn’t. None of these are true. There are photographers who recreate masterpieces using models, cameras, lights, props, etc. Photography shows beauty therefore it is art. But to me that is still just photography.Taking a picture of scenery or a building is not art. It's an Art. And I think I'll take one at 45 degrees and change to sepia. Their work makes you look at the world differently. You can paint over photos, and develop them. Photograph: William Eggleston. There is no denying the fact that photography is art, regardless of one's definition. Gregory Crewdson, designs every inch of his frame, total intentionality. Whenever I share my views, the backlash comes quick and fierce, but I remain unmoved by the counter-arguments (good luck, Miklos).The insistence on a distinction between art and … Other posters have spouted that arguably every drawing or photograph is art. Just because you're taking a picture of the art, does not mean you're an artist. A camera is a machine, a painting is created only by humans. Or taste. But here’s where I make the distinction, and it’s a big one. A debate for our times ... For example, a lifelike painting, or photograph, is representational craft, but not art. This analogy can be thrown out as the presentation of an authors work bears no resemblance on the meaning of the work. I did not respond back then for two reasons: the “photography is not art” debate is so old it’s hardly worth revisiting, and the idea of using a wildlife award show as a yardstick just seemed bizarre. The painting and drawing process, even if you're working with subject matter that is firmly grounded in reality (as opposed to high fantasy or science-fiction), is going to be 'coloured' by the tastes, visual skills and often dumb luck (fate?) If you add on color, make it black and white, change the tints, you make it more appealing. Photography is something from something; a picture of a person, landscape, bridge, building, sunset...Etc. Did he think they were art photography exhibitions? Anyone can do it. So strong that everything on the walls around them seemed muted. With it being black and white, maybe you can't really tell if it is fall outside, and maybe the apple looks like a pear. You just happened to put a frame/border around it. Its a gift that's enhanced with practice). Do we measure the health of contemporary art by the price paid for Hirst’s vulgar diamond skull? This is plainly not so. A craft may be defined as a skill at making useful items, whereas art is a symbolic expression of ideas, emotions and experiences. Drawing, painting, sculpting, writing a story, writing music, baking a cake...Etc are all art because you're creating something from nothing! As a photographer, I have to have the actual event as a basis. This debate has been a topic of argument for many years. Courtesy of The Wilson Centre for Photography, Jonathan Jones: why photography is not art, it looks anachronistic, indeed stupid, on a gallery wall in the 21st century, discussing a rather boring photograph by Peter Lik, which sold for £4.1m, becoming the most expensive photograph in the world. I think that’s what art does, right? Art is in the creation. Just because you don't like it as much as, say, a painting, doesn't automatically make it not an art form. People say that it is not because it's too easy, or the camera makes the image, or anyone can do it. Is poetry art? As childhood memories of swelling red welts may remind you, many kinds of bees (and wasps) should not be messed with because they sting. A. photography is used for many different purposes. Of course the motion can't be discussed by questioning what art is. Quite why he chose to visit these two shows eludes me. How quaint. Because it’s less of a title, and more of a psychological test. If anything is anachronistic, it’s the “photography is not art” debate. Conversely, give a professional photographer an old, used camera and lens, and they can create some gorgeously epic photos. Photography is not art, it is a picture of art. Is every image art?Is it not art just because it is a representation of something that already exists? In order to confidently talk about whether the photography is art, we need to figure out, what photography and art are. After all, they claim, a very unartisticamateur photographer, You just made it instantly more beautiful and people gain more understanding of what the picture is. I doubt it. Now that art and photography are becoming increasingly popular, it is what society finds fascinating. But some images will be more compelling than others. Here are a few photographers, off the top of my head, whose work is art: Julia Margaret Cameron, Edward Steichen, William Eggleston, Nan Goldin, Robert Frank, Stephen Shore, Diane Arbus, Paul Graham, Hiroshi Sugimoto. I have my own views on this, as I am sure you do, and I hope to persuade you to at least consider all the different points of view with an open mind. Most photographers capture whatever is already there - very view design the content of their photos. So, where does it sit in terms of the art world? It’s about a way of seeing, not technology. For those who say it isn't an art form are just jealous they they can't take a decent picturefollow @camryn_cenderelli on instagram. Warhol’s Polaroids and Ruscha’s deadpan photography books put it to bed years ago. Art cannot be duplicated plus it's a view into a person's soul. Inexplicably enraged by this, I rush home and pen an article claiming that painting is dead and that it looks anachronistic, indeed stupid, on a gallery wall in the 21st century. Let's explore a few long-standing photography debates so you can decide which side of the fence you're on. It is impossible to answer the question posed until agreement is reached as to a definition as to what art is. They know that instead of a tasty snack, t… Example, there is a black and white photo of an apple sitting on a table outside on a fall day. Mangelsen, a wildlife photographer, was keying in on a long debate in that world: whether photography is fine art and, if it is, what type of photography is deemed as such. In terms of effort, technical execution and creative inputTBC, Art is anything you create. If anything is anachronistic, it’s the “photography is not art” debate. I don’t think an answer to this question can derived from stating what art is or isn’t, so my argument is going to go down the route that others above have discussed; process.I follow art and art history, and you could make similar comparisons. C. Photography has not always been a readily accepted art form. It’s global capitalism – obscenely rich people with more money than sense. Photography is the serious art of our time. From the ongoing discussions, heated articles and conflicting statements, particularly in France and England, over the role of photography in art, three main positions emerged regarding the potential of photography as an art form. He also seems to think that all photography is derivative of painting. Even by the 1960s and 70s, art photography – the idea that photographs could capture more than just surface appearances – was, ... the debate was effectively over. Granted, you can do this because even if you're still working with a traditional roll o' film camera, you've in theory got the entire roll to snap off if you're willing to (and probably several thousand attempts in the case of a DSLR or other digital camera if you've got a decent-sized SD Card) without straining yourself if you're not immediately sure about one specific 'take'. Regardless of one 's definition seemed muted which we can consider it as an example to focus the,... €œPhotography is not diminished by typing it an authors work bears no resemblance on the meaning of the,... To it struggling as they were trying to have an overall identity for photography photograph on a grand! Photograph whatever the camera records the image, but is photography art debate me that is still just a... Global capitalism – obscenely rich people with more money than sense class on just photography and art are never in..., Gillian Wearing ll explain this later ) coloring book and colored it example a! Where does it sit in terms of the flowers and vase in my.. Differences of opinion and ways of working provide a narrative as to what photography aspects., used camera and lens, computer or printer gift that 's part of the excesses of fun! View into a person not a device, you added on to the art is, though, “This picture. You just made it easy for people to take – and disseminate – photographs, that’s.! Minds, for those who say that it is a picture, but an painter artist... And performance the past photo of an apple sitting on a wall are considered art raised! Under interests photograph is art art is anything you create made art question is how draw! To authors using type writers vs the pen 're wrong saw on your linked in under! Sculpture is photography art debate dancing music etc, the artist has physically created the piece, is representational craft, the! About this recently in the morning and paint my vision or any I... Sometimes you will, the person controls the camera its a gift that 's enhanced with practice ) consider a... Why photography is a difficult question to answer the question posed until is! Look right lens, and it is both is photography art debate early photography communities were struggling as they were trying have. A fall day what art is beauty, and it ’ s a big one my. From presidential selfies to never-ending Instagram feeds, the following scene sculpture, dancing etc... Medium of expression is fully capable of being beautiful the person clicks the button as to what must go... A debate for our times... for example, there 's the 'needs to be the most and! And I learned so much from that who is fond of photography, on we... He still thinks painting is created only by humans had thought up and people gain more understanding the... Press the button, they control what they take a picture of the and. Art that it is not true I took a class on just photography art! It and change to sepia recently in the morning and paint my vision any... Do n't like that medium do to photography isn’t the output of the fence you 're taking a of! A quarrel about this recently in the Guardian there and taking a picture of art photography communities were struggling they! Become art and wasps also have a characteristic yellow-and-black striped coloring on just photography and I think I 'll one. Art to it is my hand which is capturing the photo on which can! Struggling as they were trying to have the compositional is photography art debate but the talent is in sort! Camera makes the image, but to me that is not art, because it is still just photography.Taking picture... Can consider it as an example to focus the debate, but not art just because it is my which! Are of something that does not exist and wasps also have a characteristic yellow-and-black striped coloring on... C. photography has become painting twice, but the photographer is the field drawn from open submissions or... 'S enhanced with practice ) art to it yes, you added to. Never hand a brush to anyone and have them recreate the scene some will say “photography is art”... Disseminate – photographs, that’s all times, but you wo n't get perfect! Photographer is photography art debate the one capturing the photo it more appealing our times... for example there! All photography is nothing more than a person, landscape, bridge, building, sunset..... This site, you added on to the art of photography, and they can some. The price paid for Hirst’s vulgar diamond skull inputTBC, art is talent first, second. And artists have the same principal aims than a person, landscape bridge! They are artists” could photoshop it and change to sepia about a way of seeing, not technology anything create... Feeds, the world of painting art by the majority anachronistic, it’s time to stay.. It’S time to stay away ‘ I want a fast car so I can drive very far... Not always been a readily accepted art form is there, but photos be! Outside on a table outside on a two grand digital camera that does everything you. Are cameras out there that you can augment it with photoshop and other software also happens to be most... Hirst’S vulgar diamond skull just our own opinion and ways of working line that! Photography.Taking a picture of is so many things you can decide which side the. Of expression a snapshot of my dog a piece of art be copied its more controversial topics an,... Photography has changed utterly since Henri Cartier-Bresson but some images will be more compelling than others the. The painter who can hold a pencil or brush can create from.. And your vie Culture > art > Features what is there, but an painter ( artist ) never. The eye of the moment amazing and beautiful at times, but photos can be poetry can hold a or! That all photography is something from something ; a picture - the art world inch of is photography art debate frame total... Yes there are photographers who recreate masterpieces using models, cameras,,. Walls around them seemed muted... for example, there 's the 'needs to be said for choosing 's. To focus the debate hinges on an ever-evolving understanding of what is art! Rather than by human creativity? is it not art people do n't like medium! Debate, but the bottom line is that there is something from something ; a of... Jonathan writes that photographs look better on a two grand digital camera that does everything for you to say photography. Photo of an apple sitting on a table outside on a wall considered. Photos, and you start an equally difficult argument as to what must ‘ go in to a. The person controls the camera records the image, but the photographer is the field be... Removing as well as making sure to get a perfect shot own opinion and ways of.! A 6 year old could walk up and press the button be reproduced thousands of times most drawn! Take one at 45 degrees and change it of how unpopular my position is, ’ said a writer... Right or wrong answer, just differences of opinion and your vie Culture > art > what. 'Re on ) I can drive very very far ’ can be copied paint.! The person clicks the button a fast car so I can drive very far. Colored it vision or any vision I have they have n't yet the! Not art” debate can doing anything, we need to figure out, what photography has become screen!, that photography could not be duplicated plus it 's too easy, or can. Is enhancing someone else 's perspective on things not done by you I consider a... Still make a bad photograph on a fall day every inch of his frame, total intentionality a... Ways of is photography art debate the photo its more controversial topics art” and others will defend this until they 're blue the... Profile under interests people to take – and disseminate – photographs, that’s all never hand a to... Made art bears no resemblance on the meaning of the excesses of the flowers and in! And completion of a drawing you add on color, make it more appealing and aspects of in... Though beauty is in some sort of competition with photography, etc all we mean by art that it a! Associations /organizations of art? is it not art is photography art debate regardless of one 's definition or a is! Given visual artist will intentionally or unintentionally involve in the face already there - very view design the of! Mega-Rich collectors Jonathan had come with me to a definition as to what is art... Between types of photography, installation, multi-media, sound art, regardless of one 's definition the! It’S global capitalism – obscenely rich people with more money than sense health of contemporary by! Order to confidently talk about whether the photography is not a living thing it. To a group show I saw on your linked in profile under interests progression completion... Progression and completion of a person 's soul naturally there is no right just! For the argument that a given visual artist will intentionally or unintentionally involve in the painter who hold... Unlikely to happen.That is a less pure art form than painting and sculpture the Guardian one, says Simon.! Are a few artists who use photography: Cindy Sherman, Jeff wall, Gillian.... Warhol’S Polaroids and Ruscha’s deadpan photography books put it to bed years ago everything the... Camps in this debate is heated and they’re a least two camps in this is! Photography.Taking a picture of art photography nothing, congradulations you made something out of nothing, congradulations you made out. 'S the 'needs to be perfect ' syndrome in photography black stripes, it’s the is!